Connect with us

Top Stories

White House Slams Jen Psaki’s Remarks on Usha Vance, Calls Her “Moron”

editorial

Published

on

UPDATE: Tensions escalate as a White House official harshly criticizes former press secretary Jen Psaki for mocking Second Lady Usha Vance. In a recent episode of the “I’ve Had It” podcast, released on October 10, 2023, Psaki made controversial remarks questioning Usha Vance’s well-being in her marriage to Vice President JD Vance.

Psaki’s comments drew immediate backlash. Current White House communications director Steven Cheung took to social media platform X, labeling her a “dumbass” and a “moron.” He accused Psaki of projecting her “personal issues” onto others, stating, “She has no comprehension of the truth and has to overcompensate for her lack of talent by saying untrue things.” Cheung further referenced Psaki’s signature phrase, urging her to “circle back on that, moron.”

During the podcast, Psaki expressed concerns about Vance, describing him as “scarier in certain ways” than former President Donald Trump. She characterized him as a “little Manchurian candidate” desperate for the presidency, suggesting he would say anything to gain favor. Psaki also claimed Vance lacks charisma, remarking that he is “a little odd” and will struggle to unite the MAGA movement.

These remarks have ignited a firestorm of reactions, highlighting the ongoing political tensions within the current administration. The implications of Psaki’s comments and the White House’s fierce rebuttal underscore the heated climate in American politics today.

As this story develops, observers are keen to see how both Psaki and the Vance family respond in the coming hours. The incident raises significant questions about the ongoing dynamics between former and current White House officials, as well as the public’s perception of political figures.

Stay tuned for more updates as this story unfolds.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.