Brian Kilmeade, a host on Fox News, expressed concern over recent plaques installed under the portraits of former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the White House. The plaques, part of what has been dubbed Trump’s “Walk of Fame,” feature sharply critical commentary about both leaders and their respective administrations.
On December 17, 2025, the plaques were unveiled on the Colonnade of the White House. The content of these plaques has stirred significant debate, particularly among commentators on the network. While some, like fellow Fox pundit Jesse Watters, dismissed the installations as Trump “having a little fun,” Kilmeade took a more critical stance.
The plaque beneath Biden’s portrait includes unverified claims regarding the 2020 presidential election, stating he took office as a result of “the most corrupt Election ever seen in the United States.” It continues to accuse Biden of overseeing “unprecedented disasters” that nearly led to the country’s destruction. This portrayal has raised eyebrows among political analysts and media figures alike.
In a similar vein, the plaque for Obama describes him as “one of the most divisive political figures in American history.” It condemns various policies from his administration, notably the Affordable Care Act, claiming he imposed excessive regulations that harmed small businesses and targeted political opponents through federal agencies.
Kilmeade criticized the approach taken with the plaques, suggesting a more neutral display of presidential achievements would be preferable. “Just put the profiles up there. I am not for dispelling or saying anything bad,” he remarked. This sentiment highlights a growing concern among some commentators about the tone and direction of political discourse in the United States.
The installation of these plaques comes amid a broader conversation about how political legacies are remembered and represented, particularly in an increasingly polarized environment. While some view Trump’s actions as a form of political expression, others, like Kilmeade, argue for a more respectful acknowledgment of past presidents, regardless of their political affiliations.
As the political landscape evolves, the implications of such displays at the White House remain a topic of significant discussion. The plaques not only reflect Trump’s views but also contribute to the ongoing dialogue about how political figures are portrayed in American history.
